Steven Garofalo
Spirituality/Belief • Education • News
OUR GREATEST LEGACY (PT1)
By Steven Garofalo, March 15, 2024 (Copyright 2024)
March 15, 2024

“OUR GREATEST LEGACY”

We face a deficit of biblical morality in the family, government, corporate culture and world at large. Anyone who is a father or a leader knows that communication with their children, employees and constituents is essential to their well being, upbringing as a child, and development as a person and civilization. Today, I am going to show that we all leave a legacy, so let’s leave a really good one and not a bad one. This all starts ultimately with how we parent our children. This is what determines what the next generation reflects God’s goodness and what becomes of the world. And this is our greatest legacy.

 (This is a two part series so please remember to SHARE this with your friends and SUBSCRIBE.)

While the title of this talk is “OUR GREATEST LEGACY”, I want to focus on the life of David in 2 Samuel in an effort to illustrate an often overlooked failure within his life that directly effected his LEGACY. It’s easier to look learn from failures of others than make the same mistakes ourselves.

While tempted to give you all types of stats and data about the obvious state of the United States, Europe and the world at large, I want to give you something better-A biblical story that illustrates the core problem of today’s global demise. The reason I am doing it’s biblical principles (or lack there of) that direct peoples steps in one direction or another-for the better or worst. 

The most ancient, wise and dependable principles of how to live life are found in the ancient Scriptures. And today’s Scripture reference will focus on the life of David as written about in the book of 2 Samuel. Second Samuel was written by Samuel himself and others CIRCA 930 B.C. and later. Let’s get started:

One thing that has always baffled me about one of the most well known, biblical characters and fathers, (father)-king David, is that he-like the rest of us as imperfect human beings, made a lot selfish decisions as a person, king-leader-but also as a father. David is a great biblical character for sure, but we often don’t get a balanced view of David failures in light of his triumphs. And this detracts from the biblical lessons God has left us through the life of David. Instead, we tend to elevate God’s imperfect servant David due to all his successes-but glossing over failures. But for you and I today, it’s in the failures that some of the greatest lessons are to be learned. 

The goal today is not to focus on the FAILURE of DAVID, but how you and I today can learn from David in avoiding the pitfalls in our own life. I think this is why God gave us 2 Samuel in great part. The one major hallmark of King David that is most always overlooked is the simple fact that he had the propensity to make very poor decisions in sparing those who unjustly sought to kill him. We saw that with king Saul and now we see the same predicament with David’s own son Absalom. With Saul, I can see why David left it in God’s hands to take Saul out and not kill the anointed king-Saul himself. That being said, had David been cornered with nowhere to go but the “FOREVER BOX”, did David have the biblical right to take Saul’s life in self-defense? I will leave that up to you to decide. I know that David was wanting to be above approach, but his decision to spare his enemies often came at the expense of others who were in danger of losing their own lives. Yes, in the end God protected them all, but today, I want to get you to think about this more deeply.. Let’s fast forward to 2 Samuel 14 to look at the truth text of today’s lesson.

Rewinding to an earlier time in 2 Samuel, we read about Amnon, David’s son (from another wife) lusting after Tamar, his half sister. Now Tamar happens to be the biological sister of Absalom (David’s son from another wife). The Bible tells us that Absalom killed his half brother Amnon. for raping and disrespecting Tamar, his biological sister. As a result, Absalom fled to “TALMAI” son of Ammihud, the king of Geshur. And king David mourned for his son every day after he fled to Geshur for three years out of fear of his father putting him to death. 

Now Joab knew that the king’s heart went out to and for his son Absalom and sent a wise woman to go before king David. She made up a story about a similiar story of what I just explained in order to get the king to grant grace upon her and decree an oath of protection of such a case which reflected the same principled actions of Absalom. By doing so, king David set a precedent, similiar to our president the American legal system makes that help other cases make decisions on future cases. Then the hammer came down in that the lady asked why the king doesn’t apply the same principle to his own son. (2 Samuel 14). 

As a result of her visit, she gets king David to agree “PRINCIPALLY” not to allow the banished son to be put to death for killing his half-brother. David immediately that Joab had lovingly put this lady up to this in an effort to bring Absalom back to Jerusalem without consequence. This is what king David said:

“THEN THE KING SAID TO JOAB, BEHOLD NOW, I GRANT THIS: GO BRING BACK THE YOUNG MAN ABSALOM” (2 Samuel 14:21).

But then David failed miserably as a parent-a dad and as a leader of Israel in verse 24 which tells us this: 

David said, “…LET HIM DWELL APART IN HIS OWN HOUSE; HE IS NOT TO COME INTO PRESENCE. SO ABSALOM LIVED APART IN HIS OWN HOUSE AND DID NOT COME INTO THE KING’S PRESENCE” (2 Samuel 14:24).

THE TURNING POINT: TAKING THINGS FROM BAD TO WORST.
David gave his own son the cold soldier, forcing him back to Jerusalem, and then deliberately ignoring him instead of forgiving him, loving him and preparing him to assume the throne. Now, if you as the reader are tempted to think that Absalom was not fit to inherit the throne due to his muring his half brother, I submit the following.

Didn’t David himself covet, steal, commit adultery and then murder to cover it up? Why would we give David a pass on his sins of adultery and murder of an innocent man to cover up and not grace upon Absalom for killing his half brother who raped Absalom’s brother and disgracing her-making it impossible to marry for the rest of her life?

I “get” why David brought back Absalom, but I don’t understand why he wouldn’t even speak to his son Absalom. What was it that he was trying to achieve? Absalom was the third and favorite and favorite son of David. As such, he was the clear choice in assuming David’s throne. More than that, despite king David having received God’s favor and forgiveness for his own sins, David failed to extend the same grace and forgiveness upon his own son for his sin.

David, while a man after God’s own heart, he also acted very self-serving and wicked in applying different weights and standards to his son and others than he did to himself. Outside of God’s proclamation that the sword would never leave David’s house, I don’t believe Absalom would ever have went against David if David had not forced him to come back to Jerusalem and then shamefully ignore him.

Furthermore, David had hundreds of wives. What’s up with that? I understand that most of those wives were given to him by neighboring nations to keep peace through blood line family marriage. Never-the-less, David enjoyed Michal, Abigail, and Bathsheba, as prominent in Scripture. Deuteronomy 17:17 forbids kings from taking multiple wife’s. Despite David’s 700 wives and 300 concubines (1 Kings 11:3), David disobeyed this command.

I’m not here to defame David, but to look at how you and I can be better parents, spouses and Christian citizens in our secular world. God gave us the story of king David so that is what we are to look at for interpretation and than apply that to our lives in application.

I understand that as Christians, we often look very highly upon the life of David, but while a great leader and biblical character, he continually did some really bad things. The key word there is continually. I suppose though that his strengths outweighed his weaknesses. I think we tend to idolize David for killing Goliath and for his patients in restraining himself from battling and taking the lives of king Saul and his son Absalom. To be fair, Absalom and Saul were both wrong to pursue David in an effort to kill him, but in Absalom’s case, it was easily avoidable had David done his job as a father and national leader. And that’s my point. 

I know it’s not a popular point for many Christians to look at because David was a great man and leaders in many ways, but it’s fair and right to look at both his sinful and good sides without ignoring or elevating one over the other.

I am going to pick this up in a second episode next time, but today, I wanted to lay some groundwork for next time when we pick the story up in an effort to see why we do the same thing David did. To one degree or another, we do much the same. While we probably have not murdered a person, committed adultery, or taken multiple wives, we have committed many of these sins in our minds and hearts. Our nation and much of the Western world is in a pickle. As a result, Christianity is reflected as weak, compromised and lacking the teeth of conviction. God’s Word is quite the same and instructs us to be the same. I’m not worried about Christianity because Christianity is in the hands of God who will raise up godly leaders around the world through the ashes of what we make of Christianity as lived out in the flesh in the United States and all other countries in the world.

We as Christians and the world at large face a deficit of biblical wisdom and morality to guide it rightly. This starts with ourself which then trickles down to our family and into the values of our government, corporate cultures and society as a whole. If we don’t change this, we are going to face further pain at our own demise. And this all starts with equipping the next generation to be godly, morally driven leaders, fathers and mothers, rulers and leaders who stand on consistent principles. This means that this really starts with you and I getting out of the Christian bubble and into the world. We are not to be of the world but we are called to live “IN” the world and not avoid it (John 17:14-15).

This all starts with the family. Anyone who is a father, mother or a leader, knows that communication with their children, employees and constituents is essential to their well being as their upbringing as a child, and development as a person is what directs any culture and civilization. 

How you and I parent our children determines how the next generation will run the WORLD-the world’s corporations and government. If you are wondering how the world gotten so off-track and your government so immorally corrupt. Today’s lesson tells us just that. Let’s not only be in prayer about this in our own life and family but take action. This starts by accepting the fact that the world as we know it today is gone. This is simple history as the world empires are run by sinful men and women and all human empires rise and fall. The question is-WHAT COMES NEXT? God is on the throne and will raise up and use His remnant to create a wonderful new world, using those who know and serve his rightly, with biblical morals, and strong conviction.

Please, please check out EQUIPPEDACADEMY.COM for some very affordable online training that will help equip you as a parent at home and leaders in the marketplace.

community logo
Join the Steven Garofalo Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
WHAT DO YOU VALUE

Do you value people and relationship over people and God or the other way around?

00:01:35
Charlie Kirk's Killer Caught What's Next?

The temperature as far as free speech or about or reflecting God’s Word will NOT I REPEAT NOT be turned down but amplified,, multiplied and exemplified in the precious name and precious Blood of Jesus Christ. It’s time we get off the bench and into the game folks…God is on control but we are His servants for good and Truth in this world. Let’s please worry more about that than money and reputation.

00:07:10
Live Chat
FEAR NOT-Charlie Kirk's Death-Is A Spiritual Battle - 9/11/25, 7.24 AM

It's with great sadness that we mourn for the loss of a spiritual giant, Charlie Kirk-a man who lived his faith boldly. This is not a battle of the flesh but a spiritual battle. Let's be in prayer for Charlie Kirk's family and for the United States. And remember, FEAR NOT-this is a not a battle of flesh and blood...but a spiritual battle. I attached a brief video with my thoughts. But keep two things in mind: First, this is a spiritual battle. Second: This will galvanize the conservative and Christian movement by God in the United States and around the world.

00:04:57
The Problem Is Not God's Hiddenness-It's Ours!

Why Doesn’t God Make His Existence Unmistakably Clear to Everyone? One of the most common objections to faith is: “If God is real, why doesn’t He just show Himself beyond all doubt?” Skeptics ask why God doesn’t write His name in the sky or make His presence undeniable. But Scripture, reason, and the earliest witnesses of the Church tell us a different story: God has already made Himself known, yet it is humanity that hides. In other words, it's NOT God, it's us!

The Problem Is Not God's Hiddenness-It's Ours!
Live Chat
WHEN GOD REWARDS OUR GIVING

Jesus addresses when God rewards us for our good deeds. To be more specific, Christ discusses three pharisaic practices of piety. They include: 1) GIVING 2) PRAYER and 3) FASTING. Today, we are going to look at the first of these, which is when God rewards or does not reward our “GIVING”.

WHEN GOD REWARDS OUR GIVING
Live Chat
RADIO INTERVIEW-LOOKING BACK-Religious Freedom in 04-09-15

With the United States and world at a moral cross roads, today, we are looking back to an interview from 2015 whereby Steven was interviewed regarding "Religious Freedom". This is not a critique of any specific issues-but is a look back almost ten years (a full decade) to see where we came from. WHY? Becuase heading into 2026 we can look back to see where we are going. Again, the issue is not a critique on sexual orientation, but about religious freedom. People are people-and all people are sinners. Let's make sure to be compassionate with non-Christians in an effort to reach them for Christ while standing without compromise on the orthodox Word of God. Is that difficult. Yes it is.

GOD BLESS YOU!

RADIO INTERVIEW-LOOKING BACK-Religious Freedom in 04-09-15
A YOUNG MAN’S TRIBUTE TO CHARLIE KIRK-Must Watch
post photo preview
WHAT ARE WE WORKING FOR? RELATIONSHIP BUILDING

We live in a world driven by productivity, fast pace movement, endless expectation of growing profit. What about being still before the Lord, building relationship with our Lord and other people? I think when we get to heaven we are going to find that God had much more for us to be had with much less clutter, at a slower pace that values relationship, depth over as much mileage as we could gain, and true value in relational, loyal, loving appreciation of others. Do we really think that profit, market share, as important as they are for our mission on earth will hold any heavenly value? Or will we find that we chased the wind for temporal gain over eternal value?

SHOULD CHARLIE KIRK’S MURDERER GET THE DEATH PENALTY
By Steven Garofalo, September 12, 2025 (Copyright 2025)

THE DEATH PENALTY FOR CHARLIE KIRK’S MURDER?

Over the past week we have seen a young Ukrainian lady stabbed in the neck - murdered in cold blood by a deranged serial repeat offender who was let out of jail by writing a hand written note stating that he would be a good boy and not do that again. Her crime was simply riding the subway in Charlotte, NC. 

The criminal murderer had been arrested 14 times and let out by a judge that never passed the bar and I believe never even went to law school. She was a DEI activist judge. So what should have been his punishment?

Then there is the assasination of a Charlie Kirk. What should become of him once caught?

The Bible is very clear as to the answer to the question regarding punishment for first degree murder (speaking of humans only). I want to address this issue today for all of mankind, but especially for us as Christians. Before get jump in, I want to make clear that Christians should NEVER defy God’s Word in light of secular of secular thinking or how we feel about taking the life of a human being who pre-meditatively took the innocent life of another human being-who by the way are made in God’s image.

In order to make this not about my opinion, let’s go to what God through His word (the Holy Bible Scriptures) says from the very beginning of time as to what is to be the punishment or response administered to one who commits first degree murder. First degree murder by its very legal definition is to take an innocent life knowingly and premeditated. This is what I want to address in today’s episode. I want to digress for one brief moment in addressing the government authorities who have and continue to fail to do their job by simply incarcerating (putting and keeping criminals in jail) for the safety of the general, innocent public. That’s the more difficult question to answer-but I see it as negligence and possibly an accessory to homicide in many if not most all cases. 

So, the more more difficult question to answer is what ought be the legal and civil liability for judges, governors and other positions of power if those judges (who are acting negligently) results in the loss of human life, meaning the murder of innocent citizens by way of criminals that should have been locked up but were let out uprightly. This is gross neglegence of their part in letting these repetitive law breakers and monsters out of jail with zero cash bond or on things like a written note to behave like a good girl or boy as was the case in the North Carolina man-arrested 14 times, and who ended up murdering a young 23 year old Ukrainian woman on the Charlotte, NC subway simply because he was let out of jail on zero bond for writing a nice promise to the so called non-layer “judge” that he would stop being a bad boy and behave himself as some form of demented bond for his release. That question is yet to be debated but the Bible addresses that question as well when resulting in physical harm or loss or damage to property. Perhaps we will leave that for another day. Let’s get back to the Bible and the death penalty.

The problem with modern Christians is that they see the Bible as an ancient document, somewhat disconnected from biblical truths. In other words, many if not most modern people claiming to Christian don’t see the Bible as the ultimate Standard for right or wrong, but a nice book they can choose and pick from according to how they might feel about a particular subject.

The problem problem with modern “Christianity” is that it’s often distorted and it’s considered extreme by many for Christians to think and act biblically. 

My response this is that society and secular thinking in such cases is not moderate but extreme itself in allowing criminals to repeat crime at more extreme levels. Sadly, in some cases, such thinking results in murder and the loss of innocent life. This is what God gave us as to the consequence of shedding innocent blood in murder. Don’t get me wrong, mercy and forgiveness are very important, but we are to show mercy and forgiveness without forgoing God’s commands. We can forgive the person and still hold them to the physical consequence of the death penalty-and we should. Let’s now take a look at what God tells us about the death penalty from the very start of the Bible, starting in the Book of Genesis, chapter 9.

Genesis 9:5-6 (ESV)
“5 And for your lifeblood I will require a reckoning: from every beast I will require it and from man. From his fellow man I will require a reckoning for the life of man. 6 “Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image.”

In other words, God makes clear in the very beginning of time-in the beginning of the Bible, that homocide (first degree murder) demands a punishment that matches the crime. The justification for capital punishment, here established, is the nobility of human life… “FOR GOD MADE MAN (and woman) IN HIS OWN IMAGE”. Thus murder shows contempt for God Himself as well as for one’s fellow man. What Genesis 9 is not saying is that the death penalty is to applied to a person who accidentally ran a red light and killed another person. That still hold consequences, it not the death penalty. That’s a different discussion for a different episode.

THE POWER TO ADMINISTER THE DEATH PENALTY

To be clear, the power to administer capital punishment does not lie with us as individuals or any entity outside of the authority and power of governmental. Romans 13:3-4 makes clear of that, saying:

“3 For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one who is in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, 4 for he is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God's wrath on the wrongdoer.”

HOW SHOULD CHRISTIANS VIEW THE DEATH PENALTY?

FIRST: We must understand and accept that God has instituted capital punishment (the death penalty, not man.) It would be arrogant and presumptuous to think that we could instituted and/enforce or fail to enforce a higher standard than God commanded. After all, God is perfect and as such, has provided us the highest Standard of any being. And this standard applies not only to us as His created beings but also to God Himself due to the fact that He is all good and perfect.

God is Love as well Infinite in His essence and attributes. As such, He loves to an Infinite degree. We should also understand that God has wrath as an infinite degree, and He maintains this in perfect balance. 

SECOND: As Christians (and all human beings ), we must recognize and accept that God has given us government as the authority as we discussed for administering capital punishment, and determine when the death penalty should be applied according to God’s Word. This better ensures that innocent or people undeserving of the death penalty are not put to death wrongfully (see Genesis 9:6; Romans 13:1-7). 

IN CLOSING

Let’s be clear that it’s unbiblical to clam that God opposes the death penalty in all instances. On the flip side, Christians should not rejoice when the death penalty is employed. We can feel the satisfaction of God’s justice being implemented and upheld but we should not rejoice, meaning we ought not celebrate the death of another human being, despite their terrible crime(s). 

In the end, Christians out not fight against or picket or push back the government’s right to execute the perpetrators of the most terrible crimes, especially when involving first degree murder when it’s deserved.

It’s emotionally nice to want to extend mercy and many Christian’s defy God’s Word regarding the death penalty. In such cases, Christian are not only wrong but in defiance of God’s Word. The only answer I have as to why a Christian would do such a thing is that they have compitulated to culture insted of helping form, influence and change the world according to God’s Word. In closing I want to remind everyone of one simple truth in that God does not move to us as His created creation. Instead, we, mankind (meaning all humans-both man and woman) move to Him. He is unmovable. 

Malachi 3:6
“For I the LORD do not change; therefore you, O children of Jacob, are not consumed.”

AND SO SHOULD WE AS CHRISTIANS: 1 Corinthians 15:58 (ESV)
“58 Therefore, my beloved brothers, be steadfast, immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, knowing that in the Lord your labor is not in vain…”

Will you chose to see these verses and the entire Bible as your guide for living and what is right and wrong or will you pick which Scriptures you like or dislike and make yourself the god of the Bible as opposed to God?

Read full Article
Not Serpents of Skin, but From The Falsehood Of Sin: Uncoiling The Ending of Mark’s Gospel
By Del Potter, M.A.A. (Copyright 2025)

Not Serpents of Skin, but From The Falsehood Of Sin: Uncoiling The Ending of Mark’s Gospel

By Del Potter, M.A.A. August 27, 2025

Opening Remarks

From the outset, this article is NOT contending whether or not the ending of Mark 16 should be included. Although, it is in my humble opinion that some of the strange language in the ending of Mark actually affirms the truthfulness of the events inserted into the ending of Mark. There are several striking words in Mark's longer ending (Mark 16:17–18):

“These signs will accompany those who believe: in my name they will cast out demons; they will speak in new tongues; they will pick up serpents with their hands; and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them...”

As a first impression, the imagery suggests a miraculous ability to resist snakes and poison. It is nevertheless important to note that serpents and poison consistently function within Jewish, Biblical, and early Christian thought as symbols of false teaching and spiritual corruption, not simply physical danger.


Serpents in Scripture: Symbols of Deception

From the beginning of Genesis through Revelation, the serpent is never merely zoological—it is the archetype of deceit. In Genesis 3, the serpent slithers into the Garden not to bite with fangs, but to inject Eve with poisonous doubt about God’s word. Later Jewish wisdom literature follows this thread:

  • Ecclesiasticus (Sirach) 21:2: “Flee from sin as from the face of a serpent: for if thou comest too near it, it will bite thee.”
  • Psalm 140:3: “They make their tongue sharp as a serpent’s, and under their lips is the venom of vipers.”

This same imagery flows into the New Testament:

  • Matthew 23:33: Jesus calls the Pharisees a “brood of vipers,” not because of biology, but because of false teaching.
  • 2 Corinthians 11:3: Paul warns that, just as the serpent deceived Eve, so false teachers corrupt the simplicity of Christ.
  • Revelation 12:9: John describes Satan as a serpent “And the great dragon was thrown down, the serpent of old who is called the devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.”

Therefore, when Mark refers to "serpents" and "deadly poison," his Jewish-Christian readers would have recognized the metaphor: heresy slithering into the church among the people with its false doctrine poisoning the entire church (2 Peter 2:1).


The Poison Of Heresy: A Dangerous Drink

The early Church frequently described heretical teaching as venom or poison. Ignatius of Antioch warned the Trallians:

“I therefore, yet not I, but the love of Jesus Christ, entreat you that ye use Christian nourishment only, and abstain from herbage of a different kind; I mean heresy. For those [that are given to this] mix up Jesus Christ with their own poison, speaking things which are unworthy of credit, like those who administer a deadly drug in sweet wine, which he who is ignorant of does greedily take, with a fatal pleasure leading to his own death.” (Letter to the Trallians 107 A.D.).

This language reflects the very pattern of Mark 16—poisonous teaching disguised as nourishment. The faithful, however, are promised preservation: “it will not harm them.” The believer, rooted in Christ, can discern and resist corruption.

No early Christian expressed this more vividly than Tertullian of Carthage (c. 200 AD). In his treatise Scorpiace, he likens heresy to venomous creatures:

  • Heresy “creeps into the church like a scorpion,” injecting spiritual poison.
  • The faithful must resist with the antidote of Scripture, wielded like the staff of Moses against the serpents of Egypt.

Tertullian believed that the danger was not from reptiles in the marketplace, but rather from false teachers within the church. Similarly, heresy pierces the souls of believers in a quiet and lethal manner, just as the scorpion stings unseen. As a result, he viewed Christ's promise in Mark not as a test of reckless physical stunts, but as a promise that the faithful will not suffer from the venom of falsehood if armed with the truth. As Paul rightly reminds his audience:

 "Put on the full armor of God, so that you will be able to stand firm against the schemes of the devil (i.e. snakes & poisons)." - Ephesians 6:11


Mark’s Ending and the beginning of the Early Church

NT writers wrote within a culture steeped in metaphor. The early church never staged snake-handling rituals to “prove” faith. Instead, they testified by enduring persecution, refuting heresy, and preserving sound doctrine.

The apologetic force of Mark 16 is not spectacle—it is survival. The church would face vipers in pulpits, scorpions in councils, and poison in doctrine. Yet Christ promises: “These things will not harm you.”

Just as in the first century, serpents and scorpions creep into the church today—not in the form of reptiles, but in the form of false witnesses, compromised truth, and distorted gospels. The call of Mark 16 is not to chase miracles, but to guard against lies.

In a world full of theological poison, the believer’s protection is not daredevil faith, but faithful discernment: Scripture, the Spirit, and the witness of the saints.

“But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will also be false teachers [i.e. snakes] among you, who will secretly introduce destructive [i.e. poison] heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves.” - 2 Peter 2:1


Closing Remarks

The ending of Mark’s Gospel, far from a literal dare, is a prophetic warning and promise:

  • Serpents = false teachers.
  • Poison = heretical doctrines.
  • The promise = Christ’s people, if grounded in truth, will not be overcome.

Tertullian’s scorpions, Ignatius’ poison, Paul’s vipers, and Jesus’ own words unite: the greatest danger to the church is not fangs and venom in the field, but lies and venom in the pulpit.

In Christ, the Church endures—immune not to biology, but to blasphemy.

Read full Article
MAN'S PROBLEM-"HIDDENESS"
By Del Potter, M.A.A., August 16, 2025

The Problem Is With Man's Hiddenness Toward God, Not Vice-Versa

Why Doesn’t God Make His Existence Unmistakably Clear to Everyone?

One of the most common objections to faith is: “If God is real, why doesn’t He just show Himself beyond all doubt?” Skeptics ask why God doesn’t write His name in the sky or make His presence undeniable. But Scripture, reason, and the earliest witnesses of the Church tell us a different story: God has already made Himself known, yet it is humanity that hides.

God’s Self-Revelation in Creation

Scripture consistently teaches that God’s fingerprints are everywhere. The Apostle Paul writes:

“For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—His eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.” (Romans 1:20)

Psalm 19:1 echoes this truth: “The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of His hands.”

Job reminds us that creation itself—beasts, birds, earth, and sea—all testify to the Creator:

“But ask the beasts, and they will teach you; the birds of the heavens, and they will tell you; or the bushes of the earth, and they will teach you; and the fish of the sea will declare to you. Who among all these does not know that the hand of the Lord has done this? In His hand is the life of every living thing and the breath of all mankind.” (Job 12:7–10)

God’s existence, then, is not hidden. It is written into the very structure of reality. As St. Athanasius later argued, creation itself acts as a universal witness, speaking of God’s power to every culture and language without need for words.

Why Does God Seem Hidden?

The real issue is not divine silence but human resistance. Moses records God saying:

“I will surely hide My face in that day, because of all the evil which they shall have wrought, in that they are turned unto other gods.” (Deuteronomy 31:18)

This is not a statement about God being unknowable but about mankind turning its back to Him. God’s “hiddenness” is a moral and relational reality, not an intellectual one. As Isaiah wrote:

“Your iniquities have made a separation between you and your God.” (Isa. 59:2)

Early Christians echoed this. Justin Martyr argued that those who live according to reason (logos) recognize the true God through creation and conscience. Clement of Alexandria explained that ignorance of God is not due to His absence, but due to the blindness of the soul enslaved to passions.

The Attributes of God are Revealed According To His Nature.

If God were to force belief by overwhelming proof, He would violate the very nature of faith and love. Love cannot be compelled; it requires freedom. Blaise Pascal later captured this well: “There is enough light for those who desire to see, and enough darkness for those who do not.”

The early Church understood that God provides evidence sufficient for faith, but not coercion. Origen taught that God “gives signs to those who are willing to see, but hides from those who shut their eyes.” This allows space for genuine seeking, humility, and love—rather than forced acknowledgment.

God Is Not Hidden—We Are

When people ask, “Why doesn’t God make Himself clear?” the biblical answer is: He already has. The problem is not with God’s silence but with our ears. The witness of creation, conscience, Scripture, and Christ Himself leaves us without excuse.

It is not God who hides, but man who hides from God—just as Adam and Eve once hid in the Garden. And yet, even then, God sought them, calling out: “Where are you?” (Gen. 3:9).

The same God still calls today through the beauty of creation, the testimony of Scripture, and the living Christ. The question is not whether God is clear enough but whether we are willing to see Him more clearly!

"For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face; now I know in part, but then I will know fully, just as I also have been fully known." - 1 Corinthians 13:12

Read full Article
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals